1545 Bushkill Street
Easton, PA 18042
Phone: (610) 258-5343
Fax: (610) 330-9100
Get directions

Service Schedule

Thursday, 7:25 am

Friday, 8:00 pm
Shabbat Evening Services

Saturday, 9:30 am
Shabbat Morning Services


Donate to Bnai Abraham

Your contribution helps support a wide range of BAS programs and activities that strengthen both our congregation and the larger community.
>> Make a donation


Celebrate at
Bnai Abraham

Jewish WeddingFrom weddings and Bar/Bat Mitzvahs to business functions and lectures, our facility is a great setting and location for your special occasion.
>> More information

BAS Office Hours

Synagogue office is closed on Mondays and Fridays. Hours open: Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday from 10:00 am to 3:00 pm.

Bulletin Distribution

We are going green and
encourage bulletin distribution through email. We will also communicate emer-gencies and special events through email.
If you have not sent your email address to Bnai Abraham office staff, please submit it now.

If you would like family members or others to receive a copy of the bulletin, please send name, address, and $15 payment to Elaine at Bnai Abraham.

Religious School

BAS Religious School welcomes all children ages 1-8th grade to enrolll in 2009-2010 program. Everyone is welcome.
>> More information

Advertise in this Space!

>> More information


BAS Rabbi's Message

Rabbi's Message Archive

December, 2015

The following are two articles that I recently wrote and I hope you find them interesting. Rabbi Daniel Stein: Gov. Wolf, Legislature failing to do their jobs 5:53 am, November 2, 2015 – The Morning Call

Let's take a moment to play pretend. Let's say that a headhunter approached you with a great opportunity: a job where you'd receive great pay, benefits and a nice vacation. You might even have a small measure of fame and a degree of public esteem. The primary responsibility of that job might be to work with a group of peers to arrive at a reasonable operating budget for your employer. What would happen if you consistently failed at that task for months? How long would you reasonably expect compensation? How long would you enjoy your employer's trust?

The profound failure of Pennsylvania's Legislature and governor to arrive at a solution to the budget impasse should be a source of outrage to every citizen of the state, no matter his or her political affiliation. We send our elected officials to Harrisburg with the primary responsibility of being good stewards of the tax revenue we entrust to them.

As Morning columnist Bill White noted last week, their inability to reasonably allocate those funds in a timely way is having a real and measurable negative impact on our state's neediest residents, as well as on Pennsylvania's middle class.

Pennsylvania's human service agencies depend on the allocation and payment of state funds to perform essential tasks — many of which they are required to do as part of long-standing contracts with the state.

Very soon, we may live in a state where victims of domestic violence can find no safe haven, where the shelves of food pantries and soup kitchens lay bare, and where shelters turn the homeless onto the street because they lack the funds to pay for staff and utilities.

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette recently reported that to date, 47 not-for-profit agencies in Pennsylvania have laid off or furloughed staff. The impact of these cuts goes beyond at-risk populations: each layoff or furlough represents an attack on a middle-class employee who would have a job were it not for our government's intransigence. While the impacted employee struggles to find a new position, his former employer can only hope to recover if Harrisburg ever performs its allotted task.

As a member of the board of directors at ProJeCt of Easton, I see the impact this crisis is having firsthand. While our agency is fortunate to maintain a small emergency reserve fund, if a budget is not passed we may need to take out loans and incur costly debt — for which the state will never compensate us.

As a last resort, we may even need to make cuts to services that are proven to strengthen families and improve the fabric of our community. ProJeCt's literacy programs have a long-standing track record of improving test scores for children who need the most help; if the state does not act soon, fewer students may have access to these highly effective programs.

A popular theme on the Internet these days is the line, "You had one job!" Our state government needs to pass a budget, or it will continue to do irreparable damage to our state. If our leaders can't do the job they were elected to perform, it is time for us to vote in officials who can.


Rabbi Stein

~also submitted by Rabbi Stein~

ejewishphilanthropy.com You-Do-You-daism

Posted on NOVEMBER 4, 2015

Written by EJP By Rabbi Daniel Stein

One of the most fun parts of my job as a rabbi in Easton, Pennsylvania is the opportunity my congregation affords me to teach at Lafayette College. The smart, inquisitive students inspire me, and help me feel (kind of) culturally relevant as I move closer to middle age.

Recently after a student expressed an outlandish idea, a classmate responded, “You do you.” “Huh?” I asked. “You do you,” she said again, but with slightly more emphasis. “I heard you, but I don’t really know what that means.” “It means that even though I don’t really understand why he’s expressing that opinion, I think he’s entitled to it. You do you.” Recently, Colson Whitehead suggested in the pages of The New York Times Magazine that “‘[you] do you’ perfectly captures our narcissistic culture.” Whitehead doesn’t get it. “You do you” is symbolic of a generation of young people who are deeply postmodern: they believe that personal integrity is linked to the ways in which an individual strives to be their authentic self. They are radically accepting of diversity, while people who embrace popular culture without critique are sometimes degraded as being “basic.” My students would relate well to the famous hasidic story of Reb Zusha’s entry to heaven: “God isn’t going to ask me why I haven’t been more like King David; he’s going to ask me why I haven’t been more like Zusha.”

I was reminded of this a few months when I had the opportunity to watch a student leader address a large audience. He had a speech impediment which, I’m ashamed to say, was both distracting and intriguing to me. I was inspired that he had chosen a role that required public speaking, but was curious to know how his peers really felt about him. I opened up Yik-Yak, an app known for, among other things, promoting a culture of cyberbullying. Instead of the nastiness I’d been conditioned to believe I’d find, the most liked ‘yak’ was “Everyone’s swiping right for so & so.” Not only were the college students seemingly unbothered by the speech issues that distracted me, but they were also interested primarily in his ideas, intellect, and passion. They found his authenticity not just compelling, but sexy.

More recently, I asked a few of my students at Lafayette what they’d look for if they were to join a synagogue. Their answers anecdotally confirmed what research has been telling us in general about the decline of denominationalism in American spiritual life: “I don’t care if there is a guitar or not, or if services go for two hours on Saturday or just one on Friday evening,” one student said, “I want to be a part of a community where people are valued for the diversity of their ideas – where everyone is encouraged to cherish the beliefs they hold dear, and where our conversations are enriched by the vibrancy of disagreement. I want to be in a community where we can speak openly about important issues – God, Israel, interfaith relationships, sexuality – without fear of judgment.”

This worldview creates compelling challenges for our communal organizations. Our communities can sometimes be homogenous, both in terms of ideas and demographics. Young Jews take diversity as a given; peer groups are incomplete if they don’t have a wide representation economic, cultural, racial, and sexual attitudes and beliefs. If we don’t want our communities seen as “basic,” we need to make sure that they are open to the kind of radical diversity that today’s college students assume as a starting point for conversation.

To that end, we need to remove barriers to entry that make our communities inaccessible to young people. A few weeks ago, comedian Marc Maron’s podcast featured playwright Annie Baker, a 34-year-old Pulitzer Prize winner. Reflecting on the ways in which ticket prices impact audiences – and therefore the type of plays produced, she observed, “It is kind of unconscionable to charge more than $50 a ticket; when you pander to people [who can afford those prices], young interesting people don’t come.” Baker suggests that the kind of theater created out of a concern for attracting a wealthy audience is at best conventional, and at worst stodgy and undaring. The same is true for our legacy institutions: as long as structural, financial, and ideological barriers to entry exist, we will not be able to attract the kinds of smart young people who we hope will inherit them.

“In a world where the selfie has become our dominant art form,” Whitehead writes, “tautological phrases like ‘You do you’ provide a philosophical scaffolding for our ever-evolving, ever more complicated narcissism.” My sense, though, is that “you do you” represents not narcissism, but a generational aspiration towards collective self-esteem and self-worth; today’s young people hope to be comfortable enough in their own skin that they are able to embrace the other without feeling the need either to fear them or shame them. Our institutions could benefit from a similar optimism: a drive to create communities that are engaging, interesting, and open enough to thrive on their own, without the need to attack competing beliefs. We should view divergent ideas as opportunities for dialogue, not threats to conformity. We should hope to create a Judaism that, instead of being “basic,” is diverse, rich, complicated, and open.